Pages

Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts

Feb 1, 1812 Bishop Madison to Madison

On February 1, 1812, Right Reverend James Madison, the first bishop of the Diocese of Virginia of The Episcopal Church in the United States, wrote to his cousin President James Madison.
Bishop Madison was one of the first bishops to be consecrated to the new church after the American Revolution. He also served as the eighth president of the College of William and Mary.
He was writing to President Madison on behalf of his son-in-law, Robert G. Scott. He thought his son-in-law would be an ideal candidate to administer the collection of the new taxes proposed by Secretary of the Treasury Gallatin in his letter to the House of Representatives of January 20, 1812. This proposal called for indirect taxes including duties on distilled domestic spirits, refined sugar, retailing licenses, auction sales, carriages and stamps.
This is the last letter Bishop Madison wrote to the President. He died on March 6, 1812.
From the Right Reverend James Madison 
My dear Sir                                                    Feby 1. 1812 Williamsburg
I must once more take the Liberty of requesting your Attention to a Solicitation on Behalf of others. My Son in Law, Mr Robert G. Scott, Son of Genl Scott of Georgia, is anxious to be appointed Collector of the Revenue for the District in which Williamsburg, & the adjacent Counties may fall, according to Mr Gallatins proposed Division of the States; provided such a Measure shall be adopted by Congress. I would not, upon any Consideration, have mentioned Mr Scott to you, were I not persuaded that he possesses the Talents, the Industry, & the Integrity which such an Office requires; indeed, I know of no one more likely to discharge the Duties required with greater Correctness, & Promptitude. He is an Atty at Law, & has already acquired the Character of transacting Business with Zeal & Dispatch. His Political Principles are of the firmest republican Cast. Your favourable Attention to his Solicitation will be most gratefully remember’d both by him & myself.

My Health, I fear, is gone. I am now labouring under Dropsy. Medical aid seems to be of little Avail, tho’ I have sought for it among our most skilful Physicians. Digitalis has had some Effect; but it produces a Weakness, which could not long be supported. Tapping must be resorted to within a very short Time.
That your Health & Services to your Country may long be continued is the sincere Supplication of Yrs most truly & Affy
J Madison


Cited as: The Papers of James Madison Digital Edition, J. C. A. Stagg, editor. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, Rotunda, 2010.Canonic URL: http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/founders/JSMN-03-04-02-0175 [accessed 30 Dec 2011]Original source: Presidential Series, Volume 4 (5 November 1811–9 July 1812 and supplement 5 March 1809–19 October 1811)

Jan 31, 1812: Thomas W. Hall

On January 31,1812, Thomas W. Hall was born at Hall's Corners in Ontario County, New York. He died on September 7, 1901.  
Mr. Hall`s 89 years or 32,726 days are described in the Ontario, New York History and Genealogy Biographies  as follows: 

He was educated in the schools of that time, was a farmer with his father until 1838, and has always followed this honorable calling until he retired in 1868.
He kept a hotel a short time in connection with his farm business.  June 12, 1838, he married Mary A. Sims of this town, and they had four children: Edward, who died at the age of 17  months; John S., who is a farmer on the home farm.
He married Mary J. Fish of this town, and has two children: Roscoe F., and Mary J., both reside at home; Mary J. married James P. GAGE of Wisconsin, and they have a son, Charles H.; and Edward E., who married Jennie Dorman, who died, and he resides in town.
Mr. Hall's father, Edward, was born in Northumberland, England, in 1774, and came with his parents to the United States in 1801, coming from Albany here in flat boats to Geneva, from there to Hall's Corners through the woods with only marked trees to guide them.
He married Jane Wilson, formerly of Yorkshire, England, and they have 6 children: Sarah, Margaret, Thomas W., Mary, Jane, and Edward N.  Mr. Hall's grandfather, Edward, was born at the old home in England, and married Margaret Neven. They had three children, two sons and a daughter.
Mr. Hall's father was a constable many years, and held the position of deputy sheriff two terms under Sheriff Phineas Bates.  He died in 1860, and his wife in 1832.  Mrs. Thomas W. Hall died June 25, 1888.  (New No. 9 cemetery) 

Jan 30 1812: Private Wheeler Letter

On January 30, 1812, Private Wheeler, serving in the British army in the Peninsular War, writes to his family. Excerpts from the letter follow: 

On the 2nd inst. the 7th. Division marched to the mountains of Sierra de Gatta, in the neighbourhood of Ciudad Rodrigo. We were quartered in the village of Pio, this place contains a few miserable dwellings. We were stationed here to prevent the enemy from rendering assistance to the garrison while the siege was going on. Our duty was very severe, it consisting in furnishing piquets in the passes of the mountains, the nearest to Pio being about two leagues.

The country all around was covered with snow. To shelter ourselves from the keen frosty air that continued during our sty in this part, we dug a large hole in the snow; in the centre, we kept a good fire, around which sat the men on duty; our fuel consisted of furze and fern. Of this we had abundance from places where the snow had drifted, but in collecting it we wanted snow pattern, for often we would sink over our heads, into some hole or burrow, when we expected we had firm footing...

... We could hear the roaring of the guns at Rodrigo, and we heartily wished the place reduced; the nigh of the 19th the assault was made and the place carried by storm. This was welcome news to us. A few days after we returned to Penamacor. Here we found our new clothing and a supply of necessaries had arrived; these being issued were were made comparatively comfortable.

To fill up the remainder of this letter for want of something better I shall give you an account of the manner I have slept this winter. In one corner of the room I have, collected a quantity of dry fern, this forms my bed, it being necessary to strip to keep free from vermin. Every night the contents of my haversack is transferred to my knapsack. This forms my pillow, at the same time secures my kit and provisions from midnight marauders. 

The haversack is then converted into a nightcap. Being stripped, my legs are thrust into the sleeves of an old watch coat, carefully tied at the cuffs to keep out the cold. The other part of the coat wrapped around my body served for under blanket and sheet. Next my trousers are drawn on my legs over the sleeves of the coat, my red jacket has the distinguished place of covering my seat of honour and lastly my blanket covers all. In this manner I have slept as comfortable as a prince. No idle dreams disturb my rest.

I am in possession of that inestimable treasure, health and a lively flow of spirits. Nothing gives me trouble. I am as well off as my comrades and I am convinced we all are provided for a well the nature of the service will allow.

Since our return to Penamacor we have been employed in assisting the battering train from Saba Gal to Castala Branco. I understand the train is on the road to Elvas. If so Badajoz is the next place to be reduced. We expect to march soon. Probably my next will be from that place. It is time we moved from this place for we have nearly glutted the houses, of all wood we could rip for fuel. I am getting tired of this dreary abode. The sooner the campaign opens the better. It is true we shall have to encounter great dangers and fatigues. What of that, it is the very life and soul of a soldier to keep moving. If we do suffer privations, at times, we have some sunshiny days, and dame fortune often leads us out of difficulty and puts us into possession of all the luxuries of life. 
 Source: Private Wheeler, Private Wheeler: The Letters  of a Soldier of the 51st Light Infantry during the Peninsular War & at Waterloo (Leonaur, 2009), 62-64

Jan 20 1812 Technology






The patents can be  found in The Repertory of Arts, Manufactures and Agriculture consisting of Original Communications, Specifications of Patent Inventions, Practical and Interesting Papers (London, 1812).  The complete list can be found here


Jan 19 1812 Percy Bysshe Shelley


In the Biographical Sketch, at the beginning of The Complete Poetical Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1901), George Edward Woodberry notes a curious incident involving the poet: 
At Keswick, too, occurred the first of the personal assaults on Shelley, which tried the belief of his friends. He had begun the use of laudanum, as a relief from pain, but he had recovered from the illness which discloses this fact, before the incident occurred. On January 19, at seven o'clock at night, Shelley, hearing an unusual noise, went to the door and was struck to the ground and stunned by a blow. His landlord, alarmed by the noise, came to the scene, and the assailant fled. The affair was published in the local paper, and is spoken of by Harriet [his wife] as well as Shelley. Some of the neighbors disbelieved in it, but his simple chemical experiments had excited their minds and made him an object of suspicion, and it is to be said that the country was in a disturbed state.
Laudanum was a form of opium. It could be a potent narcotic. In the nineteenth century it was used in many patent medicines. It was prescribed for a variety of ailments. Samuel Taylor Coleridge was one of the famous laudanum addicts.

Jan 19 1812 Siege of Ciudad Rodrigo ends

Ciudad Rodrigo is a fortified city in the province of Salamanca in western Spain. It is located on the right bank of the River Águeda.  It is surrounded by two hills known as the Lesser and GreaterTesons.
Rodrigo, along with Badajoz, guarded the invasion routes from Portugal into Spain. The cities had to be taken if Wellington and his British and Portuguese army were   to campaign deep into Spain. Rodrigo was garrisoned by 2,000 well armed French troops.
The siege of Ciudad Rodrigo began on the night of 8 January 1812.  About 450 men from the Light Division seized the French redoubt on the Grand Teson. The next day the attacking forces began to building siege works on the Grand Teson.
By the 13th of January, the first parallel trench had been finish. Siege guns were placed to fire on the walls of the city. A second parallel was started on the Little Teson. It was too close to the Convent of Santa Cruz with its French outpost. Wellesley ordered a King's German Legion brigade to attack and take the French outpost. In response, the French commander of Ciudad Rodrigo ordered an attack. Five hundred French troops came out of the city, engaged the attacking forces and  recaptured the Convent of San Francisco. The British rallied, drove the French back into the city and, as night came, recaptured the convent.
By 18th of January, the British and Portuguese had created two breaches in the walls of the city. Four batteries were firing twenty-two 24-pound guns and one 18-pound gun against the main breach and seven 24-pound guns against the lesser breach.
By the 19th of January, over 9,550 shells had been fired against city. The two breaches were about 200 meters apart. The main breach was 30 metres wide. The smaller breach was about 10 metres. Wellington judged the time right and gave the order for the final attack.
Robert Burnham, in "The Siege of Ciudad Rodrigo Spain" describes the assault :
At 7 p.m. the attack began with the Cacadores rushing across the bridge and capturing the outpost. The two other regiments quickly accomplished their mission and the way was clear for the main attack. The main assault consisted of Major General McKinnon's brigade which was preceded by 150 men carrying bags of hay that were to be thrown into the ditch. There they were met by heavy defensive fire that stunned the assaulting force. About this time, the 5th and 95th Regiments had just finished their mission of clearing the faussebraie and in their enthusiasm continued onto the main breach. They actually reached it before the main assault force! McKinnon's Brigade followed closely behind them and all were stopped by the cuts made at the top of the breach. There they were came under a devastating fire from the two guns that swept the breach with canister at close range. As the British reeled in confusion, the French fired a mine buried in the breach! This massive explosion stunned the attackers for a moment and caused heavy casualties among their leaders. The British soon rallied and through heroic efforts, succeeded in silencing the two guns and capturing the breach. The way was open into the town!
The Light Division staged itself behind the Convent of San Francisco prior to its assault on the lesser breach. Despite the large number of senior officers directing it, this attack was mismanaged from the very beginning. The force carrying the bags of hay got lost and the forlorn hope attacked the faussebraie thinking it was the main wall. Once the breach was located, the main assault force quickly made its way up it with little resistance. The French defenders retreated to the town square and soon surrendered.
Ciudad Rodrigo was now in the British hands and nothing could stop the victorious troops. The next 12 hours was a wild orgy of looting, raping, drinking, and pillaging. Vast fortunes were made overnight by the plundering soldiers (who quickly spent it on liquor) and no one was safe, including their own officers. By the next morning the soldiers were brought under control and the task of repairing the damage was begun.
The British had about 1100 killed and wounded during the siege. In the assault itself, casualties among the British forces was not particularly heavy among the enlisted soldiers with about 100 killed and another 400 wounded. Officer casualties were high though, with 59 of them being killed or wounded. Casualties among the senior officers were especially high. General Craufurd, commander of the Light Division, was mortally wounded, while General McKinnon, commander of the assault force, was killed in the explosion that rocked the main breach. General Vandeleur, commander of the brigade making the assault on the lesser breach also was wounded seriously. Of the 1900 men in the French garrison, about 600 were casualties during the siege.
The capture of Ciudad Rodrigo upset French plans and strategic position. It  helped opened up the northern invasion corridor from Portugal into Spain. Wellington was to move onto Badajoz.
The experience of the inhabitants of Ciudad Rodrigo was to be more immediate and horrible. Allied troops lost all discipline, possibly as a result of the high number of officers killed, and began to burn, rampage, plunder and rape. 




Jan 15 1812: Ludditism Arrives in Yorkshire

In Leeds, there is the first indication that Luddite disturbances have spread to Yorkshire. Magistrates dispersed a crowd gathered in Leeds. 
The events are described in more detail in Luddite Bicentenary 1811-1813 as follows: 
At 9 o'clock on the evening of Wednesday the 15th of January, Magistrates in Leeds received news they must have been dreading. An informant gave them information under oath about a conspiracy to destroy machinery in the area.
Croppers were to gather en masse that night and then make their way at 11 o'clock to a new Mill at Sheepscar to "proceed to the work of destruction".
The Magistrates assembled at the office of the Town Clerk to decide what to do. They proceeded with mounted troops towards the proposed location of the attack, the meeting point being a bridge close to the Mill. Once there, they observed a number of people, who were passing the meeting place, and then returning to pass it by again, as if they were unsure of what to do. They seemed reluctant to gather, and when they finally dispersed at 1.00 a.m., the Magistrates and troops apprehended one of their number. The man had his face blacked, and carried a hammer and chisel. He also carried a large piece of burnt cork in his pocket.
For more information about the Luddites see my earlier post here.
An interesting timeline of the spread of Ludditism in Yorkshire can be found here.
Luddite Bicentenary 1811-1813 remains one of the best sources for information on the Luddite movement on the web. The site has a particularly useful examination of the historical context for the spread of the Luddite disturbances in Yorkshire here.

Jan 14 1812 William Hazlitt


Henry Crabb Robinson (1775–1867) is best know as a diarist who, in hi
s Diary, Reminiscences and Correspondence, recorded many observations and conversations with the most famous men of letters of his time such as William Hazlitt, Southey, Coleridge, Charles Lamb and William Blake. 

William Hazlitt (10 April 1778 – 18 September 1830) was an English writer, journalist, philosopher, who is now best known, if remembered at all, for his literary criticism.

On January 14, 1812, Henry Crabb Robinson wrote about one of Hazlitt's first public lectures. He writes:   

Heard first lecture by William Hazlitt on "History of English Philosophy." He seems to have no conception of the difference between a lecture and book. What he said was  sensible and excellent,  but he delivered himself in a low monotonous voice with his eyes fixed on his M.S. not once daring to look at his audience; and he read so rapidly that no one could possibly give to the matter the attention it required. 
Hazlitt's biographer, Ralph Wardle in Hazlitt (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1971) at page 126 provides more details about the the lecture: 
Tuesday, January 14, 1812, Hazlitt faced his first audience in the  rooms of the Russell Institution. His topic, as announced, was "The Writings of Hobbes, showing that he was the father of the modern system of philosophy." According to Crabb Robinson, the secretary of the institution, a Mr. Flack, told him just before the lecture that he must restrict himself to one hour. He had, unfortunately, material enough to last three hours—and he attempted to disgorge it all in an hour's time. The result was disastrous.  
He began by reading passages from the prospectus which he had prepared for his history of English philosophy, declaring that he was interested not so much in tracing the history of English philosophy as in criticizing false philosophy and formulating more sensible principles. He was off to a bad start with those of his audience who had come for information rather than theory. And they must have grown increasingly restless as he developed his thesis—that modern philosophy stemmed from Hobbes, not Locke, and that Hobbes, though original, was dead wrong—by reading long excerpts from Hobbes's work with occasional critical comments of his own... 





January 11 1812: Luddites

1812 is also the bicentennial of the Luddites.
Luddite disturbances did begin in Nottinghamshire, England in November 1811 but increased in scope as they spread to the  West Riding of Yorkshire in early 1812. Many of the disturbances took the form of machine-breaking in the wool and cotton industries.  The  Luddites were named after the mythical leader of the movement, a certain ‘General Ned Ludd’ or ‘King Ludd’, who lived in Sherwood Forest. 


There were a number of grievances that gave rise to the Luddites. Many wanted to get rid of the new machinery that supposedly was the cause unemployment. Artisan hand weavers did not want power looms or weaving frames introduced.  There were also protests against wage reductions. In general, artisans and workers were experiencing changing economic conditions that we broadly call the industrial revolution.  In addition, there were various economic difficulties caused by the disruption in economic activity as a result of the Napoleonic wars.

The tweets for January 12, 2012 come from a letter  sent on January 11, 1811 from the Magistrates of the Nottingham County.  The letter can be found here in the very interesting website, Luddite Bicentenary 1811-1813.
The Magistrates are writing to the Home Office seeking protection for John Braithwaite and Elizabeth Braithwaite. The Braithwaites were going to give evidence at trial against Wm. Carnell and Joseph Maples. The latter having been charged with having broken into the Braithwaite's home and  breaking "several Frames therein and ...[taking] away certain parts of these Frames." The Braithwaits had received various threats after the arrests were made. The Magistrates sensibly thought the Braithwaites might be safer in London.

To celebrate, the 200 years the Luddites have a website,The Luddite Link.

The above post is also based, in part, on information found in the UK national Archives website found here
UPDATE
The tweets for January 13, 2012 again come from the website Luddite Bicentenary 1811-1813 based on the following post



January 10 1812: Anne Prévost

Anne Prévost was born on January 1, 1795. 

She would have turned 17 years of age on January 1, 1812.

Anne was the daughter of George Prévost, who on July 4, 1811 had been made commander of the British forces in North America, and on October 21, 1811 had been appointed governor-in-chief of British North America. He also served as the administrator or president of Lower Canada from September 14, 1811until July15 1812.

More information about Anne can be found here including some excerpts from Anne's journal:

I was seventeen on the 1st January 1812. The Nuns of the Grand Hospital sent me a handsome cake; Mrs Baynes gave a dance in honour of the day. I danced with Captain F., Major B. and Mr. George Mountain.

January 5th: Went to Church, afterwards walked with Miss B. to the Plains. Captain C. set off on an Expedition to the United States to see what the Yankees are about.

January 7th: Walked with Miss B. to Colonel Bruyère's. So many advices have been given against Miss B. and myself walking without the Walls, that I fear we shall be obliged to give up our walks. Some say we ought not to go without gentlemen; others, that we ought not to go at all. "Oh! that I were, where I have been." Dear Halifax! there we were not obliged to circumscribe our walks within the compass of stone walls.

January 10th: At 2 o'clock walked with Miss Bruyère, Miss Grant and Miss Baley about half way to the River Charles, which is now hard frozen. We had no gentlemen, nor did we meet with any adventures. Miss Bruyère for fun, took an unloaded pistol wrapt up in her handkerchief.


January 10 1812: Gallatin Letter


Abraham Gallatin (January 29, 1761–August 12, 1849) was the United States Secretary of the Treasury in 1812. He had been Secretary of the Treasury under Jefferson and Madison. He was to become the longest serving Secretaries of the Treasury in U.S. history serving from 1801 to May 1813.                

Gallatin had been born in Geneva, Switzerland. He had risen to prominence with the Whiskey Rebellion of the 1790's after which he was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives for three terms from 1795 to 1801. Gallatin had opposed Hamilton's whiskey tax of 1791. The tax had been imposed to raise money to pay for the national debt. 
In January 1812, Gallatin had to deal with the troubled government finances that had been further harmed by the expiration of the charter for the Bank of the United States. Gallatin had tried to save the bank. This represented a great change from Gallatin's earlier opposition to Hamiltons' financial programs and national bank. In office, Gallatin had retained the main parts of Hamilton's program despite Jefferson's republican rhetoric.

Gallatin thus embodies many of the tensions of the time. He had to deal with the urgent demands of the national government for funds to pay for national expansion, internal improvements and, above all else, a military that was hopelessly underfunded as war loomed. To do so, he had to overcome his own Republican party that viewed the national debt as a form of corruption that led inevitably to taxes, the tyranny of a standing army and ultimately to the end of American liberty. 

As talk of war grew, Gallatin had to come up with innovative ways to pay for government finances. The letter of January 10, 1812 was addressed to Ezekiel Bacon, Chairman of the House's Ways and Means Committee. The letter was written to provide some answers as to how funds would be raised if war came. 

Gallatin estimated that the federal government had fixed expenses of $9.6 million, would receive $2.5 million from existing custom duties. If war came, Gallatin calculated with the Committee that a loan of $10 million would be needed. Gallatin proposed to double existing duties, reimpose an old duty on salt and new taxes on variety of items including "ardent spirits". The budgetary assumptions were widely off. The request for new taxes on alcohol adds a nice irony given Gallatin's role in the Whiskey Rebellion.

The complete letter can be found here with some excerpts below:

             [GALLATIN TO EZEKIEL BACON, M. C.]
Treasury Department, January 10, 1812.

Sir, - In answer to the first inquiry of the Committee of Ways and Means, relative to the interest arising on the proposed loan of 1,200,000 dollars, necessary to supply the deficiency in the receipts of the year 1812, I beg leave to observe that that item was not included amongst the expenses of that year, because, the estimate being made with reference to the expenses alone, which had previously been authorized by law, and a considerable proportion of those on account of the public debt falling on the first day of the year, it would not have been necessary, in that view of the subject, to borrow that sum previous to that day, and the interest would not, therefore, have become a charge till the year 1813.

With respect to the second inquiry of the committee, it was certainly contemplated, in conformity with the recommendation of the President, whose expressions were adopted in the report, to raise a revenue "sufficient at least to defray the ordinary expenses of government and to pay the interest on the public debt, including that on new loans which may be authorized." The sura of about nine millions of dollars was assumed as answering that description for the present, and the expression of " fixed revenue," which had been used in reference to existing circumstances, was inadvertently applied to the case of war. It will undoubtedly be proper, as remarked by the committee, to provide annually an additional and gradually increasing revenue, sufficient to pay the interest on loans required in the event of war. If, therefore, the loan for the present year will, according to the suggestion of the committee, amount to ten millions of dollars, the receipts into the Treasury to be provided for the year 1813 should, on those data, amount to about 9,600,000 dollars.

The committee ask, in the next place, the best opinion which I am able to form of the probable amount of receipts from duties on tonnage and merchandise in the event of war.

As that amount will depend on the extent of the commerce between the United States and nations at peace with them, and on the number of the captures respectively made by our privateers and by the enemy, it is a matter of conjecture, and not a subject of calculation ; for which reason it was stated in the report that the amount could not at present be determined. Considering the rigorous restrictions laid by France on the commerce of the United States with her own dominions and other countries under her influence, the dangers to which our commerce with the Baltic and with China will be exposed, the relations of England with Portugal and with Spain, and also that no inconsiderable part of the captures made by our privateers will be sent into foreign ports, a great defalcation in the receipts on duties on imported merchandise must be expected. The amount, under existing laws and circumstances, has, from correct data, been stated in the annual report at six millions of dollars. It would in my opinion be unsafe, in an estimate of ways and means intended to be relied on with certainty, to calculate, in the event of a war, on more than 2,500,000 dollars at the present rate of duties.

To the next inquiry of the committee, respecting the increase of those duties which is thought practicable and advisable, it is answered, without hesitation, that the rate of duties may, in the event of war, be doubled without danger or inconvenience. There will, in such an event, be less danger of smuggling at that rate than there is now with the existing duties. With that increase, the duties will still be much less on an average than those paid on importations in England, France, and most other countries. And they will be collected with more ease to government and less inconvenience to the people than could be devised to the same amount in any other manner...

…In proportion as the ability to borrow is diminished the necessity of resorting to taxation is increased. It is therefore also proper to observe that at that time the subject of the renewal of the charter of the Bank of the United States had been referred by the Senate to the Secretary of the Treasury, nor had any symptom appeared from which its absolute dissolution without any substitute could have then been anticipated. The renewal in some shape, and on a more extensive scale, was confidently relied on, and accordingly, in the report made during the same session to the Senate, the propriety of increasing the capital of the bank to $30,000,000 was submitted, with the condition that that institution should, if required, be obliged to lend one-half of its capital to the United States. The amount thus loaned might, without any inconvenience, have been increased to twenty millions ; and with $20,000,000 in hand, and loans being secured for $20,000,000 more, without any increase of the stock of the public debt at market, internal taxation would have been unnecessary for at least four years of war, nor any other resource been wanted than an additional annual loan of five millions, - a sum sufficiently moderate to be obtained from individuals and on favorable terms.

These observations are made only in reference to the finances and resources of the general government. Considerations of a different nature have on both these subjects produced a different result, which makes a resort to internal taxes now necessary, and will render loans more difficult to obtain, and their terms less favorable. …

 ...There is not any more eligible object of taxation than ardent spirits ; but the mode of taxation is liable to strong objections, particularly with respect to persons who are not professional manufacturers, and who only occasionally distill the produce of their farms. It is therefore proposed that the duties on the quantity of spirits distilled should be levied only on spirits distilled from foreign materials, at the rate of ten cents per gallon distilled ; and on other distilleries employing stills the aggregate of which shall contain more than four hundred gallons, at the rate of three cents per gallon distilled ; and that instead of a duty on the spirits, or of licenses in proportion to the time employed, all other distillers should only pay an annual tax of five dollars for each still solely employed in the distillation of fruit, and of fifteen dollars for each still otherwise employed. This tax may also, still, without reference to time, be made to vary according to the size of the stills. At those rates this class of duties is estimated to produce at most 400,000 dollars ; and it is intended in that case that another duty should be levied on the same article, in the shape of licenses to retailers. By the adoption of that mode the expenses of collection will be considerably diminished, penalties for not entering stills will be unnecessary, and they will be confined, with respect to country stills, to the case of clandestine distilling without paying the tax.

2. Duties on refined sugar. - A duty double of that heretofore laid, viz., at the rate of four cents per pound, is estimated to produce 200,000 dollars. The drawback both of that duty and of that on the importation of the raw material to be allowed.

3. Licenses to retailers. - These are believed to be susceptible of considerable and very proper augmentation and extension. The following rates are estimated to produce 700,000 dollars...

...Tavern-keepers licensed under the authority of any State, and not living in any city, town, village, or within five miles thereof, to be excepted. Every other person who sells wines, foreign spirits, or foreign merchandise, otherwise than in the vessel or package of importation, or, in the case of dry goods, otherwise than by the piece, and every person who sells domestic spirits in less quantity than thirty gallons, to be considered as a retailer.

4. Duties on sales at auction. - These confined to the sales of articles of foreign produce or manufacture, and at the same rate as heretofore, may produce about 50,000 dollars.

5. Duties upon carriages for the conveyance of persons. - Those duties, adding at the rate of fifty per cent, on the duties formerly raised, are estimated to produce 150,000 dollars.

6. Stamp duties. - An association of ideas which connects those duties with the attempt of Great Britain to tax America, and which might with equal propriety attach odium to the duty on the importation of tea, has rendered their name in some degree unpopular. The great extension of post-roads and the facility of distribution have, however, removed the most substantial objection to which they were liable. They do not appear to be more inconvenient than any other internal tax, and the expenses of collection are less than on any other, being only a commission on the sale and the cost of paper and stamping. At the same rate as heretofore, with the exception of bank-notes, on which an increase appears proper (with an option to the banks to pay -- part of their dividends in lieu thereof), they are estimated to produce 500,000 dollars….


January 9 1812: Violet Elizabeth Lee Alexander

Violet Elizabeth Lee Alexander was born on January 9, 1812 in North Carolina. 

Her name can be found at the base of the quilt found below which reads: “Violet E. L. Alexander / June 10 / 1830.”  It is a medallion quilt of about 40 inches square with a "Tree of Life" motif. 



The Smithsonian describes it as "...a typical example of a medallion quilt, popular in the early nineteenth century, and often found in the American South". 

The following biographical detail about Violet Alexander is also provided by the Smithsonian website::
Violet Elizabeth was the daughter of William Bain Alexander and Violet Davidson. Violet was born January 9, 1812. She was one of fourteen children (seven girls and seven boys) who grew up on a prosperous estate in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. On December, 27, 1831 she married Dr. Isaac Wilson, who both farmed and maintained an extensive medical practice. The couple had six children, five sons and one daughter. Two sons lost their lives in the Civil War, two others farmed in the county, and another practiced medicine. Violet died at age 33 of erysipelas, a bacterial infection, during an epidemic in 1845. This quilt was made just prior to her marriage. According to information from the donor, Dr. John E. S. Davidson, the quilt may have been made by his mother, Jane Henderson (Mrs. Edward Constantine Davidson), a friend or relative of Violet.

Source: The information and image above is  taken from the Smithsonian website, National Museum of American History

January 8 1812: Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Sully

On January 8, 1812, Thomas Jefferson wrote to Thomas Sully as follows:
I have duly received your favor of December 22d, informing me that the society of artists of the United States had made me an honorary member of their society.  I am very justly sensible of the honor they have done me, and I pray you to return them my thanks for this mark of their distinction. I fear that I can be but a very useless associate.  Time, which withers the fancy, as the other faculties of the mind and body, presses on me with a heavy hand, and distance intercepts all personal intercourse.  I can offer, therefore, but my zealous good wishes for the success of the institution, and that, embellishing with taste a country already overflowing with the useful productions, it may be able to give an innocent and pleasing direction to accumulations of wealth, which would otherwise be employed in the nourishment of coarse and vicious habits.  With these I tender to the society and to yourself the assurances of my high respect and consideration.

Sully was a portrait painter of some fame in America. He also painted most of the famous people of his time, including Thomas Jefferson.


                                                          Thomas Jefferson by Thomas Sully: Source

January 7, 1812: Duel of Nathaniel G.S. Hart

Nathaniel Gray Smith Hart (c. 1784 – January 23, 1813) was a Kentucky lawyer and brother-in-law to Henry Clay, the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives. 

The Lexington Reporter, for January 11*, 1812, reported that "...Nathaniel G.S. Hart and Samuel E. Watson, both of Lexington, had fought a duel across the Ohio River from Louisville. After each fired one shot without effect, the encounter was ended". 

The same area had been the scene of Henry Clay's duel with  Humphrey Marshall in 1809. Humphrey Marshall had called Henry Clay a liar on the floor of the Kentucky's House of Representatives. The duel was fought on January 19, 1809. Clay's first shot wounded Marshall slightly on the side. The second shots exchanged missed both men. With the exchange of the third round of shots, Clay was wounded in the thigh. At that point, the duel ended with both men retiring from the field of "honour".  

As for Nathaniel Hart, he served as Captain of the Lexington Light Infantry during the War of 1812. He died in the River Raisin Massacre on January 23, 1813.

The encounter had started on January 22, 1813, British and Native Americans attacked the Americans who were attempting to retake Detroit. The Americans suffered about 397 deaths with many more being taken prisoner. It was the highest number of Americans killed in a singe battle during the War of 1812. Though it may sound incongruous to our ears, the cry of "Remember the River Raisin" was used by Americans as a rallying cry during the war. 

* In the tweet on January 10, 2012 and in an earlier version of this  post, I wrote that the news report was from January 10, 1812. In fact, the Lexington Reporter wrote about the duel on January 11, 1812. mea culpa


January 6 1812: Sir Isaac Brock


Sir Isaac Brock arrived in Canada in 1802. 

He was promoted to Major General in June 1811. In October of the same year and the departure by Lieutenant Governor Francis Gore for England, Brock became  the senior military officer and President of the Executive Council of Upper Canada. Civil and military authority thus rested with him as war approached.

On January 6, 1812, writing from York, Major General wrote to Colonel Baynes the following letter reflecting on his attempts to raise troops:
MAJOR-GERAL BROCK TO COLONEL BAYNES.

"YORK,January 6, 1812.

"Capt. Macdonell, accompanied by the priest, arrived here some days ago. The badness of the weather has prevented his return as soon as he first proposed. All the junior commissions being already disposed of among the youths of Glengarry, I fear that little will be done in this part of the Province towards recruiting the intended corps. A few idlers may be picked up; but, without the aid of persons of influence, no great number can be expected, unless indeed the militia be called Out, and land promised.

"Understanding from Captain Macdonell that the Commander of the forces had applied to the Prince Regent for permission to offer some of the waste land of the Crown as an inducement to the Scotch emigrants to enlist, I stated the circumstances to Council, and have much pleasure in assuring His Excellency, that should he be of opinion the Present aspect of affairs calls for prompt measures, and that a direct promise of land would accelerate the recruiting, this Government will readily pledge itself to grant one, or even two, hundred acres to such as enlist on the terms proposed by His Excellency. This will be deviating largely from the King's instructions; but in these eventful and critical times, the Council conceives that an expression from His Excellency of the necessity of the measure will be sufficient to warrant a departure from the usual rules. Should His Excellency think it expedient to act immediately, and authorize a direct offer of land, I have no doubt that a number of young men might be collected between Kingston and Amhertsburg, in which case His Excellency may sanction the raising of two additional companies under my superintendence.

I have, &c.,

"ISAAC BROCK."



January 6 1812: Martha Ballard

On January 6, 1812, a Monday, Martha Ballard wrote in her Diary:
Clear morn, Cloudy aftn. I have done a larg wash for me to have put my Linning out to drie, knit at Evng. Linda filld Sausages. at home. 
The transcription above is again taken form the website dohistory. The transcription of the diary is the work of Robert R. McCausland and Cynthia MacAlman McCausland.

For more on Martha Ballard see here and here.


January 5 1812: Martha Ballard

On January 5, 1812, a Sunday, Martha Ballard wrote in her diary:

Clear. I have been at home. Jonas wife and 2 Childn here at Evng. Shee informd me that mr Tappins Text was Eclesiasts 11 C 1st vers, and that there was a Contribution for the relief of the poore that are Sick.  at home. Son Jonas wife here at Evng. 

The Biblical text referred to appears to be from Ecclesiastes 11:1. The King James Version reads: 
 Cast  thy bread upon the waters: for thou shalt find it after many days.
The transcription above is again taken form the website dohistory. The transcription of the diary is the work of Robert R. McCausland and Cynthia MacAlman McCausland.

For more on Martha Ballard see here and here.

January 5 1812 Siege of Tarifa


The Siege of Tarifa ended on January 5, 1812. 

The French forces were unsuccessful in their attempt to capture this small coastal town in Andalusia, Spain. The town had been occupied by a small British garrison since 1811. There about 4,000 British and Spanish soldiers in the town.

In November, 1811, the British garrison had attacked the French lines around Cadiz which was also under siege by the French. Marshal Soult, the French commander, then decided to attack Tarifa. He dispatched Marshal Victor with about 15,000 men taken from the troops around Cadiz.

The siege began on 20 December 1811. The French made quick progress and breached the walls of the town on the first day. The French continued to attack through to December 30 1811. They were able to establish a sixty feet wide breach in the defensive wall. At this point the weather intervened. Severe rainstorms and flash floods caused havoc for both sides but more so for the French forces. French trenches and camps were overrun by the flash floods. The French plan to attack on dawn on December 31, 1811 had to be delayed allowing the British and Spanish defenders to carry out some crucial preparations. 
The French attack began at 9 a.m. but rain again slowed the advance until the French were forced to retreat suffering between 210 to 400 casualties. In contrast, the British lost 36 men and the Spanish 20 men.

The weather continued to play a major part in the siege. Rain meant that the besieging forces was cut off from the main French armies in Cadiz. Later, the French forces in Tarifa were cut off from each other. Supplies began to run short. 

Marshall Victor tried on 1 January to reopen the attack but a heavy rainstorm hit the area on the night of 3 and 4 January. Victor had to admit that the French cause was hopeless. On the night of 4-5 January, 1812, after spiking nine of their twelve heavy guns, the French abandoned the siege.

The above is based on the information found here and in the interesting Journal of Colonel Skerrett, the British commander at Tarifa, which can be found here here .

January 4 1812: Edward E. Davis



On January 4, 1812, Edward E. Davis wrote to President Madison to seek an appointment as a physician in the army or navy. The source of the tweets are from The Papers of James Madison Digital Edition which require a subscription. The specific reference reads as follows:

From Edward E. Davis

4 January 1812, New York. Seeks appointment as a physician in the army or the navy. “I have been one of the Old Revolenterry Men of Last war where I had the Misfortune to loos one of My Leges in the Deffence of My countrys wrights.” Promises “to give Satisfaction in the Disscharge” of his duties and refers to a “Number of Gentleman who have given Certifi[c]ates” on his behalf. Requests the favor of “a few Lines” if there is a vacancy. Mentions in a postscript that the bearer, Mr. Hamilton, can furnish “every Information” about him. Adds: “I was a Prisoner on board of the Old Jersey in New York the Last war with England, And have Suffered almost every thing but Death Sir as I have been one of those Old Revoluntary Men of 76.” 
Cite as: The Papers of James Madison Digital Edition, J. C. A. Stagg, editor. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, Rotunda, 2010.
Canonic URL: http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/founders/JSMN-03-04-02-0132 [accessed 30 Dec 2011] Original source: Presidential Series, Volume 4 (5 November 1811–9 July 1812 and supplement 5 Marc

January 4 1812: Southey on Shelley


On January 4, 1812, Robert Southey (12 August 1774 – 21 March 1843) well known poet, biographer, historian, reviewer and in general a complete man of letters wrote to his friend, Grosvenor Charles Bedford (1773-1839), about the recent visit of the poet Percy Bysshe Shelley.  He wrote, in part, as follows:

...Here is a man at Keswick, who acts upon me as my own ghost would do. He is just what I was in 1794. His name is Shelley, son to the member for Shoreham; with 6000l. a year entailed upon him, and as much more in his father’s power to cut off. Beginning with romances of ghosts and murder, and with poetry at Eton, he passed, at Oxford, into metaphysics; printed half-a-dozen pages, which he entitled ‘The Necessity of Atheism;’ sent one anonymously to Coplestone, in expectation, I suppose, of converting him; was expelled in consequence; married a girl of seventeen, after being turned out of doors by his father; and here they both are, in lodgings, living upon 200l. a year, which her father allows them. He is come to the fittest physician in the world. At present he has got to the Pantheistic stage of philosophy, and, in the course of a week, I expect he will be a Berkleyan, for I have put him upon a course of Berkeley. It has surprised him a good deal to meet, for the first time in his life, with a man who perfectly understands him, and does him full justice. I tell him that all the difference between us is that he is nineteen, and I am thirty-seven; and I dare say it will not be very long before I shall succeed in convincing him that he may be a true philosopher, and do a great deal of good, with 6000l. a year; the thought of which troubles him a great deal more at present than ever the want of sixpence (for I have known such a want) did me. . . . . God help us! the world wants mending, though he did not set about it exactly in the right way. God bless you, Grosvenor!